On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 5:10 AM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is what the c.g.g.util is for AFAICT, with c.g.g.util.tools.shared > being for things usable "on server-side" (included in gwt-servlet); and as > a rule of thumb any class not listed in the javadocs we generate should be > considered "private". > I disagree with that -- I think unless the package includes "impl" or the name or Javadoc clearly indicates it is an implementation class, any public class should be considered public. -- John A. Tamplin -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
