since we're both making changes to the rebinding system, there's a very good chance that our changes are going to collide.
i'm in the process of breaking my separate compilation prototype into small pieces (generally 200-500 lines), cleaning them up, testing them, getting them reviewed, and then committed. i've got about 5500 lines remaining to run through this process. it sounds like you have a lot of outstanding changes as well. maybe yours and my changes will merge best if you do the same thing (iteratively commit in lots of small chunks). On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:41 PM, John Stalcup <stal...@google.com> wrote: > Mmmm, yes and no. > > as you know GWT.create() rebinding right now in our monolithic build pass > is statically calculated at compile time. > > i'm working on adding a separate build pass and this pass requires that > GWT.create() handling be done dynamically at runtime. > > the monolithic pass has smaller output and longer compile time and is best > for production releases. > the separate pass has larger output and shorter compile time and is best > for developer productivity. > > so monolithic compilation and it's compile time GWT.create() rebinding > will never completely go away since it is key to smallest possible output > size. > > that being said, any extension of GWT.create() functionality that can't > also be implemented at runtime for the separate compilation pass, will not > be approved, at least not by me. > > > > On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Andrés Testi > <andres.a.te...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Thanks for the clarification, John. Does this mean that >> UnifyAst.UnifyVisitor.handleGwtCreate() will be deprecated/removed? I'm >> afraid because I'm working on a prototype with heavy changes on >> handleGwtCreate(). >> >> - Andrés Testi >> >> El viernes, 25 de octubre de 2013 16:17:55 UTC-3, John Stalcup escribió: >>> >>> it's purpose is described in https://gwt-review.** >>> googlesource.com/#/c/4981/<https://gwt-review.googlesource.com/#/c/4981/> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Andrés Testi <andres....@gmail.com>wrote: >>> >>>> I just found this class in the master but I can't find references to >>>> it. Where is ReboundTypeRecorder intended to be used? >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> - Andrés Testi >>>> >>>> -- >>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/Google-Web-Toolkit-**Contributors<http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-**contributors+unsubscribe@** >>>> googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit >>>> https://groups.google.com/**groups/opt_out<https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out> >>>> . >>>> >>> >>> -- >> http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. >> > > -- http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
