I followed with JsInterop and implement a basic version of Promise (not
full implemented).
The code is here:
1)
https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/tree/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/api/promise
<https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/tree/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/api/promise>
(Promise
API)
2)
https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/tree/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory
(Factory API)
I found some things, for example:
Promise has the "catch" method, and this is a reserved word in Java.
Then, on the interface that represents Promise, can not be put this method.
Perhaps, there could be a JsAlias for functions:
@JsType(isNative = true, prototype = "Promise")
public interface Promise {
Promise then(PromiseThenFn f, PromiseThenFn error);
@JsAlias(value="catch")
Promise catchError(PromiseThenFn error);
}
Another annoying thing is the management function as a parameter, for
example:
In JS:
var p = new Promise (function (resolved, rejected) {...});
In Java I emulated it this way, and if not the best:
@JsType
public interface PromiseFn {
void f(Resolve resolve, Rejected rejected);
}
// In JS Class Factory
public static native PromiseFn Function(PromiseFn fn) /*-{
return function(resolve, rejected){
fn.f(resolve, rejected);
}
}-*/;
And use this:
final Promise p3 = Browser.newPromise(JS.Function(new PromiseFn() {
@Override
public void f(Resolve resolve, Rejected rejected) {
resolve.resolve("Resolve Promise P3");
}
}));
I do not know if they are working in a cleaner way to work with functions
to JS style.
Example Usage of Promise:
Promise p1 = Browser.newPromise(JS.Function(new PromiseFn() {
@Override
public void f(Resolve resolve, Rejected rejected) {
resolve.resolve("Resolve Promise P1");
}
}));
p1.then(
JS.Function(
new PromiseThenFn() {
@Override
public Promise f(final Object changed) {
Browser.getWindow().getConsole().log("Promise Complete: " +
changed);
return Browser.newPromise(JS.Function(new PromiseFn() {
@Override
public void f(Resolve resolve, Rejected rejected) {
resolve.resolve(changed + " > Other Promise");
}
}));
}
}), JS.Function(
new PromiseThenFn() {
@Override
public Promise f(final Object changed) {
Browser.getWindow().getConsole().log("Promise with Error: "
+ changed);
return Browser.newPromise(JS.Function(new PromiseFn() {
@Override
public void f(Resolve resolve, Rejected rejected) {
rejected.rejected(changed + " > Other With Error
Promise");
}
}));
}
})
).then(
JS.Function(
new PromiseThenFn() {
@Override
public Promise f(final Object changed) {
Browser.getWindow().getConsole().log("Promise Complete:
" + changed);
return null;
}
}),
JS.Function(
new PromiseThenFn() {
@Override
public Promise f(Object changed) {
Browser.getWindow().getConsole().log("Promise with Error:
" + changed);
return null;
}
})
);
The Result:
["Promise Complete: Resolve Promise P1", cZ: ph, cM: Object, tM: function,
__elementTypeId$: 1, __elementTypeCategory$: 3]
["Promise Complete: Resolve Promise P1 > Other Promise", cZ: ph, cM: Object
, tM: function, __elementTypeId$: 1, __elementTypeCategory$: 3]
Thanks and hope to suggestions.
El jueves, 21 de agosto de 2014 13:33:38 UTC-3, Goktug Gokdogan escribió:
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:29 AM, Cristian Rinaldi <csri...@gmail.com
> <javascript:>> wrote:
>
>> Thanks +Goktug Gokdogan for response.
>>
>> APT is very good option and java 8 support for GWT 3.0 would be a amazing
>> thing.
>> You have a planning for Elemental 2.0 or initial documentation to share,
>> to how you plan address the desing?
>>
>>
> Nothing planned yet other than the plan to work on it :) My anticipation
> is. initially we will auto generate JsTyped DOM, deal with problems and
> incrementally improve it.
>
>
>> El miércoles, 20 de agosto de 2014 16:38:31 UTC-3, Goktug Gokdogan
>> escribió:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Cristian Rinaldi <csri...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Community:
>>>> I'm playing with JsInterop , and I have two questions:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Are you planning to try the static methods of JS objects, such
>>>> as Object, Promise, etc.?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> There will be some static helpers provided from the SDK. I originally
>>> started the JSNI 2.0 document but it is basically waiting for me to start
>>> on Elemental 2.0 and accumulate more experience to turn it into something
>>> more concrete.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2) How do when an instance is mapped to an existing Object, eg
>>>> Promise, has a constructor with parameters?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Actually I have new ideas on this derived from how some other APTs work.
>>>
>>> I need to update the JsInterop doc but these are the options that I'm
>>> thinking right now:
>>>
>>> *Option 1 (works better for extending):*
>>>
>>> @JsType(prototype = "Promise")public interface Promise {
>>> /* Protoype_Promise is an autogenerated package visible class */
>>> public static class Prototype extends Protoype_Promise {
>>> public Prototype(Function... functions) {
>>> super(functions);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> void then(Function f);
>>>
>>> void cath(Function f);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Option 2 (works better for general use):*
>>>
>>> @JsType(prototype = "Promise")public interface Promise {
>>> /* Protoype_Promise is an autogenerated package visible class */
>>> public static Promise create(Function... functions) {
>>> return new Protoype_Promise(functions);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void then(Function f);
>>>
>>> void cath(Function f);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Of course one can do both:*
>>>
>>> @JsType(prototype = "Promise")public interface Promise {
>>>
>>> public static class Prototype extends Protoype_Promise {
>>> public Prototype(Function... functions) {
>>> super(functions);
>>> }
>>> }
>>>
>>> public static Promise create(Function... functions) {
>>> return new Prototype(functions);
>>> }
>>>
>>> void then(Function f);
>>>
>>> void cath(Function f);
>>> }
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Currently to resolve this 1) I created the following class Factory:
>>>> JS
>>>> <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/blob/master/src/main/java/com/workingflows/js/jscore/client/factory/JS.java>
>>>>
>>>> But the interfaces define a contract at the level instance of a
>>>> class or object, this way of doing things, I do not know if it is
>>>> semantically correct.
>>>>
>>>> To solve 2) there are not many options:
>>>>
>>>> Create a Factory that returns an instance of the object, because
>>>> it has no meaning, only to make the new, implement the interface, because
>>>> the compiler already does.
>>>> There is some progress in this?
>>>>
>>>> I saw in one of the post a proposal to do something like this:
>>>>
>>>> Promise Promise.Prototype p = new (new Function ....., new
>>>> Function ....);
>>>>
>>>> Where Promise, is the interface defined with prototype = "Promise".
>>>>
>>>> @JsType(isNative = true, prototype = "Promise")
>>>> public interface Promise {
>>>>
>>>> void then(Function f);
>>>>
>>>> void cath(Function f);
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Here 'access to jsCore project:
>>>>
>>>> https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/
>>>> <https://github.com/workingflows/gwt-jscore/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Great work. This kind of stuff is also very valuable as a feedback.
>>>
>>>
>>>> I hope the answers ...
>>>>
>>>> greetings
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>> Groups "GWT Contributors" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>> an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscribe@
>>>> googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/
>>>> msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/3268ccc7-9953-
>>>> 49c9-9079-574096f0d5d3%40googlegroups.com
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/3268ccc7-9953-49c9-9079-574096f0d5d3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "GWT Contributors" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> <javascript:>.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/44fbf2d1-d791-4e7b-8078-5e804c3da99e%40googlegroups.com
>>
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/44fbf2d1-d791-4e7b-8078-5e804c3da99e%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT
Contributors" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/b4c4bfb4-9470-49a0-9ab2-67e855ed1a0c%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
