Hey, I actually also thought about that in the past but never had time to implement it. You can read my thoughts at https://groups.google.com/d/msg/codehaus-mojo-gwt-maven-plugin-users/tSI4ZqjNZD8/uMt0TMHW2sUJ
Basically instead of @Asynchonize I would have used @RemoteService as that matches the "old" interface name you currently have to extend. Also I would have introduced a @GenerationStrategy annotation because in the Async interface you can return void, Request or RequestBuilder which allows you to customize the request or even cancel it. -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/2705daf8-bd6a-4eee-9d20-5b325d9e58b7%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
