Are there plans to optimize this in the GWT2.x version in the future? On Friday, April 15, 2016 at 10:57:00 AM UTC-4, Roberto Lublinerman wrote: > > Yes, right now all lambdas are implemented as anonymous inner classes, > even the ones implementing JsFunction interfaces. > > On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 6:11 AM, Paul Stockley <pstoc...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> Am I right in saying that java 8 lambda's under the covers is implemented >> as an anonymous inner class? Is this also true for SAM interfaces annotated >> with JsFunction annotated interfaces? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Contributors" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/369a5094-7e64-4351-b1e5-16ff5a3a2468%40googlegroups.com >> >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/369a5094-7e64-4351-b1e5-16ff5a3a2468%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/9fce9c7d-b956-4fcf-b16a-8d25ffb69e57%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
