Hi Colin, if you need some help, I'm feeling to help. Specially the jakarta stuff is important for us. Do you find the time to have a look to the open PR?
BR Rocco Colin Alworth schrieb am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2023 um 16:44:58 UTC+2: > There have been a few suggestions of making a release in the near future, > and it seemed like it might be a good idea to summarize pending > development, ask for help to land these, and see if anything else needs to > be addressed before shipping. > > > - There is a pending branch (not yet a PR for GWT itself) working on > adding a new gwt-servlet-jakarta.jar and requestfactory-server-jakarta.jar > as part of https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9727. There is no > plan at this time to update the DevMode server to Jakarta, though that > will > eventually be inevitable if we move to a newer version of Jetty. Work on > this can be found at https://github.com/niloc132/gwt/pull/3. > - There is a pending fix for eliminating a false positive from using > some internals of protobuf to deobfuscate client side exceptions > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9785. This is probably safe to > land without more testing, but none of the reporters of this bug have > verified the fix. > - There's a pending fix for a bug in type unions, which can be caused > by some ternary expressions and var type declarations > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9799. A review found a few > oversights in testing, and I'd appreciate another look. > - There's a pending fix for a bug where debugging in firefox when > assertions are enabled (for example in SDM). It turns out the bug can > happen in other cases too in more subtle ways. A draft fix it at > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9800. > - GWT itself can now be built on Java 11, but not yet 17. There are a > few changes pending that will permit this. Additionally, this will enable > adding more Java 9-11 JRE emulation, see the list at > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9547. > > > Finally, we have an open question about future Java 8 support. Beyond this > release, we likely will no longer support running the compiler in Java 8, > which will enable adding support for Java 12-17 language features. We can > likely still build jars that will run on a Java 8 server, but just can't > compile newer JS. To that end, this 2.11 release branch may be longer-lived > than usual, depending on feedback and support to continue bugfix releases > after 2.12 eventually ships. > > Are there other changes that 2.11 should included, or other considerations > for this release cycle? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/bdfaccff-0ab1-4690-96b4-7813c46357d6n%40googlegroups.com.
