Hi Colin, if you need some help, I'm feeling to help. Specially the jakarta stuff is important for us. Do you find the time to have a look to the open PR?
BR Rocco Colin Alworth schrieb am Mittwoch, 17. Mai 2023 um 16:44:58 UTC+2: > There have been a few suggestions of making a release in the near future, > and it seemed like it might be a good idea to summarize pending > development, ask for help to land these, and see if anything else needs to > be addressed before shipping. > > > - There is a pending branch (not yet a PR for GWT itself) working on > adding a new gwt-servlet-jakarta.jar and requestfactory-server-jakarta.jar > as part of https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9727. There is no > plan at this time to update the DevMode server to Jakarta, though that > will > eventually be inevitable if we move to a newer version of Jetty. Work on > this can be found at https://github.com/niloc132/gwt/pull/3. > - There is a pending fix for eliminating a false positive from using > some internals of protobuf to deobfuscate client side exceptions > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9785. This is probably safe to > land without more testing, but none of the reporters of this bug have > verified the fix. > - There's a pending fix for a bug in type unions, which can be caused > by some ternary expressions and var type declarations > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9799. A review found a few > oversights in testing, and I'd appreciate another look. > - There's a pending fix for a bug where debugging in firefox when > assertions are enabled (for example in SDM). It turns out the bug can > happen in other cases too in more subtle ways. A draft fix it at > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/pull/9800. > - GWT itself can now be built on Java 11, but not yet 17. There are a > few changes pending that will permit this. Additionally, this will enable > adding more Java 9-11 JRE emulation, see the list at > https://github.com/gwtproject/gwt/issues/9547. > > > Finally, we have an open question about future Java 8 support. Beyond this > release, we likely will no longer support running the compiler in Java 8, > which will enable adding support for Java 12-17 language features. We can > likely still build jars that will run on a Java 8 server, but just can't > compile newer JS. To that end, this 2.11 release branch may be longer-lived > than usual, depending on feedback and support to continue bugfix releases > after 2.12 eventually ships. > > Are there other changes that 2.11 should included, or other considerations > for this release cycle? > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Contributors" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit-contributors+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit-contributors/bdfaccff-0ab1-4690-96b4-7813c46357d6n%40googlegroups.com.
