Is your server running and accepting connections on port 8888? If not, that
would explain the connection being refused.


On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 2:58 PM, JohnMudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Ok, I gave it a try.  I ran "demo-shell -noserver" and got a pop-up
> window with the following msg.
>
>    The connection was refused when
>    attempting to contact localhost:8888.
>
> Without the -noserver I get this.
>
>    General Error:
>    java.lang.NumberFormatException: For input
>    string: "8888/com.mudd.demo"
>
> Do I need to disable the code that calls my XML/RPC server in order to
> run with the -noserver option?
>
> John
>
>
>
> On Oct 14, 1:10 pm, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The -noserver option lets you debug your GWT client code in hosted mode
> > while running any server you like, Tomcat or otherwise.On Tue, Oct 14,
> 2008 at 12:58 PM, JohnMudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Running "demo-shell -noserver" doesn't change my situation.  I'm using
> > > an XML/RPC server, not Tomcat.
> >
> > > $ demo-shell -?
> > > Unknown argument: -?
> > > Google Web Toolkit 1.4.62
> > > GWTShell [-port port-number | "auto"] [-noserver] [-whitelist
> > > whitelist-string] [-blacklist blacklist-string] [-logLevel level] [-
> > > gen dir] [-out dir] [-style style] [url]
> >
> > > where
> > >  -port       Runs an embedded Tomcat instance on the specified port
> > > (defaults to 8888)
> > >  -noserver   Prevents the embedded Tomcat server from running, even
> > > if a port is specified
> > > ...
> >
> > > On Oct 14, 11:43 am, "Isaac Truett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Why can't you run hosted mode with the -noserver option?
> >
> > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 11:38 AM, JohnMudd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Any way to get the same sort of debugging support in compile mode
> as
> > > > > in shell mode?
> >
> > > > > I'm using XML/RPC so I have to run in compile mode, not shell mode.
> > > > > The biggest drawback is all errors are not caught and reported.
>  That
> > > > > turns simple errors into long bug hunts.
> >
> > > > > I'm running inside a try block now and reporting all exceptions
> (that
> > > > > are caught) in a log panel.  That helps but I still run into errors
> > > > > that go uncaught, just as trying to use panel object that has been
> set
> > > > > to null.  All I get now in unexpected behavior that I have to
> manually
> > > > > track down.
> >
> > > > > If the problem is just that there's "no place" to report errors in
> > > > > compile mode then I'd be happy to provide a panel object where
> error
> > > > > messages can be added.
> >
> > > > > John
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to