Your assumption is pretty much correct. The problem is memory management in Javascript is very dependent on the browser's implementation. However, in most cases I don't think it's as efficient as Java's memory management. Unfortunately, you can't really do much about this since it's a browser issue.
-- Arthur Kalmenson On Sat, Jan 17, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Adligo <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I have been writing GWT assuming that it did garbage collection > similar to the way that java does, or in other words it looks for > Objects (chunks of memory) which don't have any active references > pointing to them and removes those from the heap via the garbage > collector. Is this general assumption correct? > > > Cheers, > Scott > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
