Errai Framework is awesome, and we are using parts of it (like jaxrs); however its too much focussed on javaee specific development (which is great btw but too heavy for general and ever-evolving use-cases and has a steep learning curve viz. custom CDI/IOC). mvp4g <https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fmvp4g%2Fmvp4g&sa=D&sntz=1&usg=AFQjCNFZVdRFuONp-UOuqjqn34NLz-YTdg> again uses GIN.
Also, IMO JS frameworks like vue, react or polymer are very good for creating isolated custom components and rendering HTML. However for MVP/data-flow/binding/architecture they might not be the ideal solution (other than if you are going to fully commit to them for future use and as we all know there is a new js framework every month deprecating the old one). Vanilla js (which in this case cross-compiled by the awesome GWT compiler), is the path we would want to take. Still open to other suggestions. On Friday, October 13, 2017 at 10:28:16 AM UTC-4, DavidN wrote: > > I'm also depending on GWTP for my projects. It would be nice if it somehow > got migrated to Dagger, but I guess the company behind it stopped doing GWT > work. > > I'm considering moving to a mix of GWT with Vue.js in combination with > Vue-routing. > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:14 PM Subhrajyoti Moitra <subhra...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> U can try http://erraiframework.org/ or https://github.com/mvp4g/mvp4g >> as alternatives. >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 7:30 PM, hy <harsh...@gmail.com <javascript:>> >> wrote: >> >>> Is anyone using any GWT MVP based framework? >>> >>> We have been using GWTP, however the development on it seems to be >>> stalled and it still depends on GIN, which is also not under active >>> development. >>> >>> GWTP is extremely powerful, however a lack of investment in it recently >>> has been concerning for us and we would like to be sure that our app is >>> future compatible. >>> >>> So, is there any other framework anyone is using out there that works >>> like GWTP and would take minimum transition (from GIN to Dagger, etc.); and >>> has a future compatibility (annotation processing, raw HTML, etc.). >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "GWT Users" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> <javascript:>. >>> To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com >>> <javascript:>. >>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "GWT Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> To post to this group, send email to google-we...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:>. >> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
