I thank you Thomas for the clarification unfortunately I am forced to use 
setters and getters because I cannot find another way to set the values and 
compile the GWT java client.
As you said I seem to have solved it with:

@JsProperty public native String getCodeAdministration();

@JsProperty public native void setCodeAdministration(String 
codeAdministration);

Il giorno martedì 21 maggio 2024 alle 17:15:59 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer ha 
scritto:

> With the following:
>
> @JsType(namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object", isNative = true)
> public class XXXGWT {
>     public String codiceAmministrazione;
> }
>
> you should be able to write:
>
> var xxx = new XXXGWT();
> xxx.codiceAmministrazione = "foo";
>
> and have it translate more or less to:
>
> let xxx = new $wnd.Object()
> xxx.codiceAmministrazione = "foo";
>
> With the getter and setter, you have to annotate them with @JsProperty, 
> but the generated JS will be identical, so you've actually only made your 
> code more verbose for no compelling reasons (besides maybe pleasing static 
> analyzers like Sonar that will yell if you don't encapsulate fields).
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 21, 2024 at 4:30:35 PM UTC+2 tenti...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> Just to be clear on my use case this is my java class:
>
> @JsType(namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, name = "Object", isNative = true)
> public class XXXGWT {
>
>     private String codiceAmministrazione;
>     
>     @JsConstructor
> public DocumentoPAC4DTOGWT() {}
>
> public native String getCodiceAmministrazione();
>
> public native void setCodiceAmministrazione(String codiceAmministrazione);
>
> }
>
> and this is the erorr i'm getting on the setter : 
>
>
> DesktopApp-0.js:13132 Tue May 21 16:24:02 GMT+200 2024 
> com.google.gwt.logging.client.LogConfiguration SEVERE: Exception caught: 
> (TypeError) : b.setCodiceAmministrazione is not a function 
> com.google.gwt.event.shared.UmbrellaException: Exception caught: 
> (TypeError) : b.setCodiceAmministrazione is not a function
> Il giorno martedì 21 maggio 2024 alle 14:56:22 UTC+2 Marco Tenti 
> (IoProgrammo88) ha scritto:
>
> Sorry Thomas about your last comment "  I'd rather user fields than 
> getters/setters for such objects "  can you point me out to some example 
> for this ?
>
> Il giorno mercoledì 29 giugno 2022 alle 09:48:49 UTC+2 Thomas Broyer ha 
> scritto:
>
> Using isNative=true, you're telling GWT that you're only "mapping" in Java 
> a *type* that exists in JS. The default naming rule is that the full name 
> of that type is the fully qualified name of the Java class, you can change 
> the simple name with 'name', and the *prefix* with namespace (which 
> defaults to the package name for top-level classes, or the enclosing type's 
> JS name for nested classes). So with namespace=GLOBAL but without the 
> name="Object", you're saying that you want to basically do a 'new 
> $wnd.MyPluginConfig()' in JS, and the browser rightfully complains that 
> there's no such MyPluginConfig. Adding name="Object" means you'll do a 'new 
> $wnd.Object()' in JS.
>
> Fwiw, I'd rather user fields than getters/setters for such objects. YMMV.
>
> On Wednesday, June 29, 2022 at 8:38:19 AM UTC+2 Nicolas Chamouard wrote:
>
> Thank you !
> It is a bit mysterious to me, but with *name = "Object"* the constructor 
> works :)
>
>
> Le mercredi 29 juin 2022 à 00:47:32 UTC+2, m.conr...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> try adding name = "Object" so that it uses an empty javascript Object as 
> the wrapped item.
>
> I found this via Googling:
>
> @JsType(namespace = JsPackage.GLOBAL, isNative = true, name = "Object") 
> public class MyPluginConfig { @JsProperty public void setXXXX(String 
> str); @JsProperty public String getXXXX(); ... }
>
> Ref: https://stackoverflow.com/a/36329387/12407701
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 6:24 PM Nicolas Chamouard <ncham...@alara-group.fr> 
> wrote:
>
> Yes, it does not change anything : 
>
> @JsType(*isNative*=*true*, *namespace* = JsPackage.*GLOBAL*)
>
> *public* *class* OptionOverrides {
>
>
>     @JsConstructor
>
>     *public* OptionOverrides() {}
>
>     
>
>     @JsProperty
>
>     *public* *native* String getInitialView();
>
>     @JsProperty
>
>     *public* *native* *void* setInitialView(String initialView);
>
> }
>
>
> Still the same error : *$wnd.OptionOverrides is not a constructor*
>
> Le mardi 28 juin 2022 à 23:27:08 UTC+2, m.conr...@gmail.com a écrit :
>
> Have you tried giving the class a constructor?
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 4:04 PM Nicolas Chamouard <ncham...@alara-group.fr> 
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using JsInterop to integrate FullCalendar to my GWT application.
> As described here https://fullcalendar.io/docs/initialize-globals, I am 
> supposed to create an object literal and pass it to the Calendar() 
> constructor.
>
> I have managed to create this class : 
>
> @JsType(*namespace* = JsPackage.*GLOBAL*)
>
> *public* *class* OptionOverrides {
>
>
>     @JsProperty
>
>     *public* *native* String getInitialView();
>
>     @JsProperty
>
>     *public* *native* *void* setInitialView(String initialView);
>
> }
>
> It works but the FullCalendar complains about all the Java Object stuff 
> that is translated to javascript : equals(), hashCode(), etc
>
> I have tried to add* isNative=true* to my class, but in this case i 
> cannot instantiate it in Java (error : $wnd.OptionOverrides is not a 
> constructor)
>
> Is there an other way to do this, am I missing something here ?
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/a03c881a-48d4-4892-9fae-7719bc9a57b8n%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/a03c881a-48d4-4892-9fae-7719bc9a57b8n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "GWT Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4d8099ea-3a37-4026-b459-f228e35ca59bn%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/4d8099ea-3a37-4026-b459-f228e35ca59bn%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT 
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/google-web-toolkit/5ee556d1-0ef6-443f-86b8-355f4619cf07n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to