Sounds like a massive project you got there indeed. I wish you luck getting all that sorted.
I'm confident its loading time, as the bars show me. Thanks for the information on the transatlantic load times, thats good to know that isnt the reason. On Mar 4, 5:16 pm, Lothar Kimmeringer <j...@kimmeringer.de> wrote: > Darkflame schrieb: > > > My bandwidth is fine (8Mb/s down), but I suspect the sever is slow > > hence the difference. For one thing, I'm in the netherlands and its in > > america. > > That should be visible by checking the download-bar (at the > bottom of the window of e.g. InternetExplorer). That way you > can see quite easily if it takes long to load or to render > the page. > > If your starting page is very complex, this might be the reason > for the long startup-time but in that case you would always > have this time and not only the first time you load the page. > > BTW: We're not living in the 90s anymore with only one sea- > cable connecting Europe to the USA where you were able to > greet every byte by handshake. So even if you load my > GWT-application from a server in the USA you shouldn't > have significantly lower speeds than loading from a server > in your own country. > > > 1MB?! Thats a hell of a lot of code you got there :p > > Yes, and it's going to grow even more, so I'm waiting > for being able to modularize GWT-projects as well like > many others ;-) > > > Even my biggest project...a java online adventure game still in > > development...is only 250kb. > > The application in question is the administrative backend > of some kind of ApplicationServer including user- > management of various communication-protocols that are > integrated. So for every service of that server has (about 30) > and for every communication-protocol the server supports > (about 8) you need a specific administrative page (which can > become quite complex) with dialog-boxes allowing the edit of > a vast range of values. In addition you have tools like a SQL- > frontend, usage of the communication-protocols with managed > authentication-settings, certificate-management for protocols > like AS2 and SSH and so on and so on. > > So things summed up a bit ;-) > > > I have noticed I get 1MB files if I compile by right clicking on the > > xml and going "Run as GWT Hosted Mode" and then compile, but I get > > vastely smaller files (150kb) if I use eclipse's run system itself and > > then compile (I assume the plugin for the right click isnt as > > efficiant..something causes quite a huge difference anyway). > > I use the Ant Script that has been created by Instantiation's > WindowBuilder and changed it in a way that it's not exporting > everything including the Java-sources and all the libraries > that are shipped with the server-application anyway (reducing > the size of the war-file from about 35 MB to about 3 MB now. > > When looking into the created HTML file it looks like the > obfuscated compile-result and the only way to reduce the size > of this I can think of is throwing away the line-breaks which > would lead to a reduction of 14 KB in my case. Still this > will be more than 1 MB to download so I will leave it the > way it is ;-) > > Regards, Lothar --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
