i think for very very large results the real solution it's a flow
panel with custom div panels inside and asinchronous
load of the results, i mean starting with rendering the initial result
part and then in separate calls download and append the rest of
the results.

On 6 Mar, 08:48, Magius <antonio.diaz....@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've had the same problem in an application for a customer that uses
> IE.
> Finally I've decided to create a paged table to show only a few rows
> in screen.
> In this way it's faster to render the table.
> It's a workaround, not really a solution, but it was acceptable for
> the customer.
>
> On Mar 5, 3:47 pm, eadams <harriersoftw...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > After searching for additional posts on slow FlexTable performance, I
> > followed someone's suggestion to use Grid instead. A FlexTable wasn't
> > needed as the structure of the displayed lists is not dynamic. The
> > Grid displays a parts list of over 1000 parts in under 3 seconds. The
> > smaller lists (200-300) parts are under 2 seconds. The solution now in
> > place includes:
>
> > Use Grid instead of FlexTable
> > Build the Grid before adding to the scroll panel or other panel
> > This was only an issue in IE
>
> > Thanks, Ernie
>
> > On Mar 5, 3:33 am, Lex <alexey.tsiunc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Hello all,
>
> > > And we are generating the Table HTML on server side, and put it as
> > > innerHTML and have performance 1000 rows - 3-4 second in IE.
> > > The biggest problem is using components which should handle events and
> > > placed in such table, but it seems JSNI is a solution in this case. In
> > > our case Links already working.
> > > So it seems this is the optimal solution if you need high performance.
>
> > > On Mar 4, 7:36 pm, eadams <harriersoftw...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Thanks for the suggestions.
>
> > > > Changing the code to add the FlexTable to the scroll panel after
> > > > loading the data resulted in a good improvement. The 268 row parts
> > > > list will now load in IE in just over 5 seconds. I tried the setVisible
> > > > () suggestion as well, but that did not yield much change. The changes
> > > > yielded an elapsed time of 0.3 seconds in Firefox.
>
> > > > On Mar 4, 11:55 am, Lothar Kimmeringer <j...@kimmeringer.de> wrote:
>
> > > > > eadams schrieb:
>
> > > > > > The
> > > > > > timings showed the first third was in about 1.5 seconds, the next
> > > > > > third was in about 4 seconds and the last third in over 6 seconds.
> > > > > > This elapsed time is after thedatahas been received from the server
> > > > > > (which is also very fast).
>
> > > > > > All of the above is on a Windows Vista client using IE 7. Testing 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > same code on FireFox 3.0.6, the 268 rows display in under 1 second. 
> > > > > > Is
> > > > > > this a known problem with IE and are there any work arounds?
> > > > > > Unfortunately FireFox is not a solution for this issue as the
> > > > > > company's only approved browser is IE.
>
> > > > > It's a rendering issue and not the only one. Try creating a
> > > > > Tree with 100.000 elements and have a look how much fun you
> > > > > have with InternetExplorer and Firefox (Safari is very fast
> > > > > here which makes me jealous).
>
> > > > > One thing I haven't tried but you might try out is adding
> > > > > the flex-table to the panel after adding all rows. This
> > > > > might speed up things because InternetExplorer seems to
> > > > > redraw the whole table when adding rows (this is not GWT-
> > > > > specific, I had the same effects with other web-frameworks
> > > > > in the Good Old Days(R) as well). Or - if that has no effect -
> > > > > you might play around with setVisible.
>
> > > > > Regards, Lothar
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to