On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:39 AM, Vitali Lovich <vlov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The "obfuscated" code is just javascript which I explained to you how to > load. > I disagree because: * Obfuscated, optimized code mangles the functions and classes names. If this mangling, is not deterministic and constant between compiler executions, the plugin method names are different. So, how the app and the plugin can invoke each other? * There are missing code paths never used by your app, but needed by the plugin. And the reverse. Oh, and inlining. * Gwt builds are self contained, we do not want the plugin to have its own copy of everything. With optimized, obfuscated code you need some way to tell the compiler what symbols preserve. The same as you tell a C++ compiler/linker when doing a library, the symbols to export. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
