Sorry to bring it up but it's the first thing I check on every
project, and is a hairy one with gwt.


On Apr 8, 5:29 pm, David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we might have to just change to Apache 2. The problem with
> creating our own license is that people wanting to use the framework
> might need to hire a lawyer first :)
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Vitali Lovich <vlov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It really is an interesting question about how the GWT compiler affects the
> > license.  At the end of the day, you could just add an explicit exemption to
> > the LGPL license to clarify the issue - you may want to get advice from a
> > lawyer (or maybe there are some FSF forums out there) on the precise
> > language to use.
>
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 10:33 AM, Joe Cole <profilercorporat...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
>
> >> IANAL but I believe you are stuck with liberal licensing or creating
> >> your own special license.
> >> In practice license makes no difference; if the project is successful
> >> it will always have contributions back.
>
> >> Joe
> >> On Apr 8, 1:07 am, David Tinker <david.tin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hmm. Our intention is to allow the use of GWT Portlets in commercial
> >> > closed source projects without forcing those projects to become open
> >> > source. We do want people who modify the framework to contribute their
> >> > changes back to the community. That is why we chose LGPL instead of
> >> > GPL or Apache 2.
>
> >> > Is there anyone on this thread who is a lawyer who can answer this
> >> > question? What do we need to do to fulfill our intent as described
> >> > above?
>
> >> > Cheers
> >> > David
>
> >> > On Apr 7, 12:48 pm, Joe Cole <profilercorporat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > Your logic applies to normal java linking (see fsf's lgpl and java
> >> > > post) but with gwt, it seems it may be thought of as static linking:
>
> >> > > >http://pocketdope.blogspot.com/2008/02/why-you-shouldnt-use-lgpl-for-...
>
> >> > > Personally, I would agree.
>
> >> > > Thoughts?
>
> >> > > On Apr 7, 3:04 pm, Vitali Lovich <vlov...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2009 at 10:21 PM, Joe Cole
> >> > > > <profilercorporat...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> > > > > Looks great. What are the implications for the use of the LGPL?
> >> > > > > From
> >> > > > > my understanding LGPL + gwt = distribute source?
>
> >> > > > No - you only have to distribute the changes you make to the library
> >> > > > (can't
> >> > > > recall the fundamental differences between v2 & v3 for LGPL, but
> >> > > > this
> >> > > > remains the same because that's the fundamental reason LGPL exists
> >> > > > in
> >> > > > parallel with GPL).
>
> >> > > > > Joe
>
> >> > > > > On Apr 7, 1:37 am, "david.tin...@gmail.com"
> >> > > > > <david.tin...@gmail.com>
> >> > > > > wrote:
> >> > > > > > GWT Portlets is a free open source web framework for building
> >> > > > > > modular
> >> > > > > > GWT (Google Web Toolkit) applications. GWT provides the low
> >> > > > > > level
> >> > > > > > building blocks required to build web applications (Java to
> >> > > > > > Javascript
> >> > > > > > compiler, basic UI widgets, an RPC mechanism etc.) but typical
> >> > > > > > business applications can benefit from the additional
> >> > > > > > scaffolding
> >> > > > > > provided by GWT Portlets. In traditional web applications this
> >> > > > > > role
> >> > > > > > would be fulfilled by Struts and other web frameworks.
>
> >> > > > > >http://www.gwtportlets.org/
>
> >> > > > > > Please have a look. All feedback will be appreciated.
>
> >> > > > > > Note that the signup mails send by the site tend to get eaten by
> >> > > > > > spam
> >> > > > > > filters so check your spam folder if you don't receive the mail.
>
> >> > > > > > Thanks
> >> > > > > > David
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to