Ah, that's not a bad idea actually. Using a regex that is… I might actually try that.
I haven't actually looked at the compiler source yet, but I think I'll do that tomorrow. I'll update if I come up with anything. On 6 Maj, 22:00, Alyxandor <a.revolution.ultra.b...@gmail.com> wrote: > This is true, > > I was thinking of this later, and saw that in many cases, this COULD > be done, > And it can be done outside of the gwt compiler, if you like. > > Some fancy regexp to find functions with EXACT method bodies and > renaming+deletion could potentially decrease file sizes dramatically, > but only for Obfuscated code... Possibly a fourth compiler option > "PRODUCTION" which would do all the extra permutations for final > builds, using text functions after the Java->JavaScript magic > happens. One look at the logic trees from the compiler is enough to > scare a stone into cold sweat, so to me, it seems easier to just use > RegExp; capture the argument names, back-reference them in the method > bodies, create generic method signatures, search for equalities, and > then replace them down to a minimum. > > If someone who actually works on the compiler has any input, I'd love > to hear it. > > /Starring this issue now... --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
