okay, so I dug into this a bit and figured out how to port existing code to GWT compliant standards. I also included _CustomFieldSerializers. I am currently only using Key and Text in my test code, but I ported Key, Text, Blob, ShortBlob, Link and User however I haven't tested much beyond the Key and Text classes.
here is a link to the jars and some notes about them: www.resmarksystems.com/code I hope it is helpful :) -bryce On May 14, 11:22 am, bcottam <bcot...@gmail.com> wrote: > yeah, I actually posted there > first:http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/browse_thread/th... > and they suggested that I cross-post here :) > > I actually started using the persisteddataclasses and sending them > across the gwt rpc channel, and that was fine until the datanucleus > JDO started putting fields on my classes that were instances of Object > [] (which don't serialize all that well). That, and I know there is > going to be a performance hit with sending a lot ofdataover the > channel. So, I am thinking that doing a lite DTO just for transport > would possibly be my best option. > > I will check out Ray Cromwells posts, mainly I guess what I am looking > for at this point is a good reference for using the "super-source" tag > and how to make custom wrappers for non GWT classes (in the same > manner that the java.util api is wrapped with com.google.emul etc. > Any pointers in that direction would be great. > > thanks! > > On May 13, 7:59 pm, Alyxandor <a.revolution.ultra.b...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'm really not sure, but I'd recommend checking out theAppengine > > google group > > first...http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java?hl=en > > > There's over a hundred posts a day there, so I'm sure someone there > > with a little more expertise than yours truly will be of more help. > > > Out of curiosity, have you already tried sending your persistentdata > > classes down the wire? Cos.... There's a lot of discussion about it, > > and some workarounds {basically, the only ways I could do it was with > > Ray Cromwell's various hacks, or a drop-in called Gilead}. You might > > find that using the same beans to be nigh impossible without making > > them non-detachable {read: you can send an object to the client, > > modify it and send it back to the server to save without copying the > > object, or manually copying thedatafrom every field}. > > > ...Check the other group, like I said... I'm no expert. > > > Of course, Ray Cromwell IS, so if you can find his Google-Groups > > profile, try clicking on some of the threads he posts on... You'll be > > glad you did! --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
