Anyone?
Still getting this "invisible animation" issue on firefox, as 50ms
seemed to be fine on older versions, but not any more.

Is there really no way to "wait till display" ? Or at least to see
what the minimum update unit is for the clients browser/system.


On Jul 17, 6:26 pm, twdarkflame <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> umm.displayed, I mean, not displaced :P
>
> On Jul 17, 5:30 pm, darkflame <darkfl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Ive noticed sometimes when trying to animate stuff by flicking an
> > image between urls, that if something changes too quickly, the changes
> > arnt noticable.
> > ("too quickly" in firefox 3 seems to be around 50ms on my machine).
>
> > The URL's are changed in the DOM, I can see them animating correctly
> > in firebug.
> > However, the visual from image 1.png>2.png>3.png>1.png isnt happening,
> > it looks to the viewer as if 1.png is the only frame.
>
> > So is there a method to make sure the new image is actualy displaced?
> > to test that a url change has propergated though to what the user
> > actualy see's on the screen?
>
> > (note; Images are prefetched already, so should all be in cache.
> > Also, image bundles arnt an option, as they are dynamicaly loaded. Oh,
> > and the images are frames of an animation, so all the same size)
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to Google-Web-Toolkit@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to