Well, that is what I am sort of doing. And it turns out to be a kind of service location.
There are some workarounds, and they are nothing more than just that: a workaround. I am letting GIN build all of my presenters, and then I let them bind the UIs. Not nice, but that is the way with the fewest dependency lookup calls for me atm. On 9 Dez., 16:13, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Dec 9, 12:50 pm, "P.G.Taboada" <pgtabo...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > as many other GWT developers I really like the above mentioned > > approaches. > > > I am having a little bit of pain when it comes down to embedding views > > into views. UiBinder and GIN don't play well together, I am struggling > > with ugly locator pattern usages to create my sub/ embedded views. My > > code is now full of //WORKAROUND task tags, hoping to get it solved > > somehow someday. > > > But that is the point: at which direction should I look? MVP tells me > > to have views injected into my presenter, really nice. UiBinder on the > > other hand needs the views, would create them properly, but then they > > would not be available to GIN (compile-time vs. runtime). > > > If my feeling is right, we would need some way to hook up into the > > UIBinder, providing a GIN based MVP resolver, quite similar to the > > variable resolvers people use in JSF to get hands on Spring beans from > > JSF. But as far I can see, UiBinder does not provide such extension > > point. > > > Any thoughts here? > > How about injecting your "child views" (or Provider<>s) into your view > and then use @UiField(provided=true) to tell UiBinder you're providing > those widgets? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
