thanks a lot for your replies !! that's exactly what I needed :) On Jan 7, 6:42 am, Brendan Kenny <bcke...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I ran into the same problem. If the issue is just exposing the > style names during development (and you're not looking for this > particular solution for an additional reason), I would do as fvisticot > suggests and then just remove that line from your module's xml file > when you're ready for production mode. It's been a while since I > looked at this, but I believe I also just used > > @external styleName; > > in the ui:style section to prevent particular style names from being > obfuscated. I found the example here a little confusing, but the > concept is simple > enough:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/CssResource#External... > > On Jan 6, 9:07 am, emerix <rafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > I found on this > > pagehttp://code.google.com/intl/fr-FR/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideClien... > > that you can use the property CssResource.obfuscationPrefix to choose > > how to obfuscate your css selectors. > > However I don't know if it is possible to use it to have a custom > > obfuscation. > > During the development phase, I'm using firebug to adjust padding, > > margin... of my widgets and it became quite difficult with the > > obsucated css class names... > > > What I would like is a way to have .G1qdtwdtK-MyWidgetName instead > > of .G1qdtwdtK for a css class named .MyWidgetName > > > Is that feasible ? > > > thanks !
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
