I've used the method here (http://www.amateurinmotion.com/articles/ 2009/11/02/async-with-gin.html) to handle services.
It is a mixture of 1 and 2, you inject the services into the presenter (Is it is Guice best practice to inject what you need instead of injecting the service registry), but you also have a service registry. Then when you have another GINjector you can pass the services registry to that and use the service methods as providers for the services. On Jan 20, 4:09 am, Yaakov <yaakov.chai...@gmail.com> wrote: > So, in the case where you might end up needing more than 1 service, it > seems from what I've read, there are 2 approaches out there: > 1) Pass ALL services (via their interfaces) to the presenter. This can > also be done by injecting them. > 2) Have a global service registry which initializes all the services > in the entire app and can be reached throughout the app, i.e., > EditContectServiceAsync GWTServiceRegistry.getEditContactService(). > > Anyone care to comment which way is better and why? Both approaches > seem to be valid and have their pros/cons. > > Also, are there any other approaches to this that anyone knows about? > > Thanks, > Yaakov. > > On Jan 16, 8:43 pm, ojay <oliver.ja...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > i agree with Julien .... it would be interesting how his case would be > > handled. Does somebody has an idea? > > > Hope somebody will response to this topic > > > On 10 Jan., 14:30, Juju <funkybre...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > There is one thing that I don't understand very well. I'm building an > > > application with multiple services (imagine something like > > > contactService, teamService, etc). Is there multiple AppController? In > > > yourexample, the AppController is link with one service (the > > > ContactService). It's a little dark for me. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Julien > > > > On 3 jan, 20:48, Flemming Boller <flemming.bol...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi Chris > > > > > Thanks for you input around the dividing of presenters and views in > > > > bigger > > > > apps like Gmail. > > > > > Do you have any brief input on how runAsync andMVPplay together? > > > > > /Flemming > > > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 8:36 PM, Chris Ramsdale <cramsd...@google.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > Yaakov, > > > > > > Having multiple presenters driving a single view would be a bit > > > > > strange. > > > > > Typically want to the presenter to define the display interface that > > > > > the > > > > > view will implement. Having multiple presenters drive a single view > > > > > means > > > > > that either a) the display interface is defined in some parent > > > > > presenter > > > > > class, or b) one of the presenters is responsible for defining the > > > > > display > > > > > interface. Either way, it decouples the presenter->display > > > > > relationship that > > > > > is inherent to theMVParchitecture. > > > > > > For applications with large UI frontends, you could consider breaking > > > > > the > > > > > UI up into smaller presenter/view pairs that are managed by some > > > > > controller > > > > > class. Take forexampleGmail; the folder list would be one presenter > > > > > with > > > > > an associated view, the inbox list another, the Google Talk interface > > > > > another, and so on. All of these would then be managed by some > > > > > MainViewController class. > > > > > > Keeping widget-based code out of the presenter for ease of testing is > > > > > golden. Beyond that it's really a question how much code you want to > > > > > maintain within a single presenter and view. > > > > > > On Sun, Jan 3, 2010 at 9:20 AM, Yaakov Chaikin > > > > > <yaakov.chai...@gmail.com>wrote: > > > > > >> Chris, or anyone else with experience onMVPin GWT... > > > > > >> Practically, do you always have 1 view as the user sees it, i.e., the > > > > >> whole GUI, or if your GUI has many components (as most GUIs do), do > > > > >> you have multiple views, and most importantly, multiple presenters, > > > > >> presenting 1 coherent view to the user? In yourexample, this would be > > > > >> similar to splitting the GUI into a view that has the buttons and the > > > > >> GUI that has the list. > > > > > >> How would that be handled inMVP? > > > > > >> Thanks, > > > > >> Yaakov. > > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Chris Ramsdale > > > > >> <cramsd...@google.com> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >> > While I see that someone has already found it, I just wanted to let > > > > >> everyone > > > > >> > know that it's officially there. > > > > > >>http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/mvp-architectur... > > > > > >> > We're looking to put together parts 2 and 3 shortly. So far I have > > > > >> > UI > > > > >> Binder > > > > >> > and Code Splitting integration as topics of interest. Let us know > > > > >> > what > > > > >> else > > > > >> > would be of help. > > > > >> > - Chris > > > > > >> > On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 1:00 PM, jpnet <jprichard...@gmail.com> > > > > >> > wrote: > > > > > >> >> I really like this article: > > > > > >>http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/doc/latest/tutorial/mvp-architectur... > > > > > >> >> However, it's almost useless without the entire source package. > > > > >> >> Are > > > > >> >> there any plans to post the source code? > > > > > >> >> Thanks, > > > > > >> >> JP > > > > > >> >> -- > > > > > >> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > >> >> To post to this group, send email to> > > > > >> >> >>google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to> >> > > > > >> >> >>google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsu > > > > >> >> bscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > >> . > > > > >> >> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > >> > -- > > > > > >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > > >> > To post to this group, send email to> > > > > >> > >>google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to> >> > > > > >> > >google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsub > > > > >> > scr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > >> . > > > > >> > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > >> -- > > > > > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > >> Groups > > > > >> "Google Web Toolkit" group.> >> To post to this group, send email > > > > >> togoogle-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > > > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to> > > > > >> >>google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsu > > > > >> bscr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > >> . > > > > >> For more options, visit this group at > > > > >>http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > > > -- > > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > > > > Groups > > > > > "Google Web Toolkit" group.> > To post to this group, send email > > > > > togoogle-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to> > > > > > >google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsub > > > > > scr...@googlegroups.com> > > > > > . > > > > > For more options, visit this group at > > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
