Ok, I just found the page that talks about it: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/DeferredBindingsForJRE
I am not sure if this will work for the GWT compile process, but I'll try. I also not understanding this line in the document: ************************ Because the browser is not always known, you must specify a default deferred binding that is suitable on all browsers. Add that deferred binding to Emulation.gwt.xml. Here is what it looks like for StringBuffer..... ************************ It this telling us to unwrap the gwt-user.jar, change Emulation.gwt.xml and and rewrap it again??? Thanks, Yaakov. On Feb 24, 1:35 pm, Yaakov <yaakov.chai...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I seem to remember seeing somewhere that it's possible to through > gwt.xml to substitute your own class instead of the GWT-provided one. > Could someone point me to a resource where it would explain how to do > it, etc. > > The reason I am attempting this is because of this bug in GWT > compiler:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4423 > > I would really like to use generics in my Async interface and Andrew > submitted a patch which doesn't look like will be making it into GWT > release any time soon (judging by the status of the bug). > > Any help would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > Yaakov. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.