On Mar 1, 8:13 am, tekbe <tim_ehl...@gmx.de> wrote: > Thank You! But is this really the intended behaviour? I don't > understand why null should not be serializable. > > When switching back to gwt 1.7.3 the very same example works. > > Can someone please tell if this is a bug or a feature? And if this is > a feature, why did the behaviour change? > > thanks.
//I'm a noob, since few moths into Java changin' variables type from int to Integer should solve the issue ... The Integer wrapper is safe to be null (default value when initialized) and valid. You can also change all the other variable's primitive types example:boolean -->Boolean I hope I have got the point. Regards -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
