I can tell you they are working on a data bound grid and tree control and various compiler optimizations for 2.1. I have been following the changes and they have created a 2.1 branch in svn. I wouldn't worry about it being abandoned, the commits are happening every day to the GWT codebase.
On May 13, 12:02 pm, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote: > All signs point to the GWT team being buried up to their eyeballs with > preparations for Google I/O next week. I expect there will be at least one > GWT announcement made at that conference, which might include some hints at > upcoming features. Late May or early June might be a better time to ask > questions about future direction. > > > > > > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Ed <post2edb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > He Paul, > > Yes, but still some global roadmap would be nice, such that you can > > plan on it. > > For example: suppose I would need dnd support and don't want to use an > > external lib. If I know GWT will build it in the Q3, then I will wait, > > otherwise I might decide to build it myself. > > > Ed > > > On May 13, 11:12 am, Paul Robinson <ukcue...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Google are not good at keeping an up-to-date roadmap - I think they've > > > removed the roadmap they did have from the docs (unless I just can't > > > find it now). This probably means they don't want to publish a roadmap, > > > or they don't want to keep one up to date all the time, or they don't > > > plan gwt much beyond their current work. I certainly don't think it's an > > > indication they're planning on dropping gwt (and even if they were, it's > > > open source with a friendly licence, so I can't see it dying any time > > soon). > > > > I don't know whether you should worry, all I can say is I'm heavily > > > invested in GWT, and I'm not worried. > > > > Paul > > > > Ed wrote: > > > > What is the current Roadmap of GWT? (what are the plans for version > > > > 2.5, 3.0, etc...) > > > > Do I need to get worried because it's still unknown what the roadmap > > > > is? > > > > Ed > > > > -- > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com > > . > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > cr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > > For more options, visit this group athttp:// > > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs > > cr...@googlegroups.com> > > . > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.