I can tell you they are working on a data bound grid and tree control
and various compiler optimizations for 2.1. I have been following the
changes and they have created a 2.1 branch in svn. I wouldn't worry
about it being abandoned, the commits are happening every day to the
GWT codebase.


On May 13, 12:02 pm, Isaac Truett <itru...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All signs point to the GWT team being buried up to their eyeballs with
> preparations for Google I/O next week. I expect there will be at least one
> GWT announcement made at that conference, which might include some hints at
> upcoming features. Late May or early June might be a better time to ask
> questions about future direction.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Ed <post2edb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > He Paul,
> > Yes, but still some global roadmap would be nice, such that you can
> > plan on it.
> > For example: suppose I would need dnd support and don't want to use an
> > external lib. If I know GWT will build it in the Q3, then I will wait,
> > otherwise I might decide to build it myself.
>
> > Ed
>
> > On May 13, 11:12 am, Paul Robinson <ukcue...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Google are not good at keeping an up-to-date roadmap - I think they've
> > > removed the roadmap they did have from the docs (unless I just can't
> > > find it now). This probably means they don't want to publish a roadmap,
> > > or they don't want to keep one up to date all the time, or they don't
> > > plan gwt much beyond their current work. I certainly don't think it's an
> > > indication they're planning on dropping gwt (and even if they were, it's
> > > open source with a friendly licence, so I can't see it dying any time
> > soon).
>
> > > I don't know whether you should worry, all I can say is I'm heavily
> > > invested in GWT, and I'm not worried.
>
> > > Paul
>
> > > Ed wrote:
> > > > What is the current Roadmap of GWT? (what are the plans for version
> > > > 2.5, 3.0, etc...)
> > > > Do I need to get worried because it's still unknown what the roadmap
> > > > is?
> > > > Ed
>
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com
> > .
> > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs 
> > cr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > > For more options, visit this group athttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com<google-web-toolkit%2Bunsubs 
> > cr...@googlegroups.com>
> > .
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group 
> athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to