Thanks for your answer Stefan.. Well, self optimization is out of question..I would rather choose to implement my own serialization. the size of object graph is not huge. usual rpc mechanism produce 5kb payload, but the direct-eval rpc 350kb.. I do belive that they will correct this behaviour in the near future. :)
On May 24, 6:32 pm, Stefan Bachert <stefanbach...@yahoo.de> wrote: > Hi, > > I guess you can optimize yourself by removing/compressing repeated > data. > You may return in a call all children of a certain item, this saves > repeating the "parent". > > It sounds that you are going to send huge complex structures. For GWT > I would consider to request data only when they become visible. > > However, some how I could not believe to compress GWT-RPC data by a > factor of 70. > This is what the starter app exchanges > > POST: > 5|0|6|http://gwtworld.de:8888/xt/|B3E96A978B0717279C7F8CFDC241E855| > x.client.GreetingService|greetServer|java.lang.String/2004016611|GWT > User|1|2|3|4|1|5|6| > > REPLY: > //OK[1,["Hello, GWT User!<br><br>I am running jetty-6.1.x.<br><br>It > looks like you are using:<br>Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; de; rv: > 1.9.0.19) Gecko/2010040118 Ubuntu/8.10 (intrepid) Firefox/3.0.19"], > 0,5] > > Hardly to believe that any other technique will compress it by a > factor 70. (POST 2 Bytes REPLY 2 Bytes?) > > Stefan Bacherthttp://gwtworld.de > > On 24 Mai, 14:37, Gursel Koca <gurselk...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > I am using direct-eval rpc. The performance is better than the usual > > gwt-rpc mechanism especially in dev mode. > > But while I am checking the payload size with fiddler, I am > > surprised > > to notice the payload size is 70 times more than usual rpc mechanism. > > > Serialized domain objects represents organizational hierarchy, > > therefore they do have parent child relation. I believe that this is > > the reason , why the payload is much more.. > > > Are there any planned improvement on this subject?.. > > > Thanks in advance, > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group > > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group > athttp://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text - -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
