It always annoys me when I post a "how do I do X?" question, and the answer is "why would you want to do X?", but in this case I really am confused. GWT is a development tool for generating static JavaScript applications; what are you hoping to accomplish with the Java reflection APIs?
On Jul 7, 1:17 pm, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 7 juil, 17:25, Pavel Lahoda <plah...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Congrats to the new M2 of 2.1 release of the GWT framework. > > Is there any chance that we'll see some progress in the area of making > > GWT Java API subset more complete to the original libraries ? > > To be specific : is there any chance, that Reflection API gets > > implemented ? There are some projects that do just that, so it is > > proof it can be done, just none of them is complete (I haven't seen a > > project that would allow reflection of annotations in the runtime) > > plus it would be great if such a standard feature of the language > > makes it into standard distribution. Please, make this happen. Thanks. > > Might I ask why you'd need it? (given that every single class is known > at compile-time, why couldn't you use some generator to do the hard- > work? of it'd probably mean organizing your code differently, but > allowing any kind of reflection at runtime would mean that the GWT > compiler don't prune any field or method from any class, which is > precisely what it does best!) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
