Hi, I would avoid vaadin. Agreed that vaadin looks good out of the box, vaadin falls back into the poor old fat-client architecture. GWT supports a real responsive client-server architecture but vaadin uses GWT like a display server.
You can test the difference using the sample http://demo.vaadin.com/Calc Click a number and it tooks 300ms until the calc will display it. This latency is a direct consequence of choosing the poor old architecture. Stefan Bachert http://gwtworld.de On 10 Aug., 09:02, Nathan Wells <nwwe...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would look into vaadin. We just looked at it recently, and I think > it's a good alternative to straight GWT, but we can't switch because > it's a pretty significant change. > > On Aug 10, 5:23 am, Shawn Brown <big.coffee.lo...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I'm looking to get this group's feedback before I present my findings > > > to the team. What do you think? > > > If open source is nice then go for gpl and ExtGWT (GXT). If you don't > > pay the commercial fee, then you have to open source your project I > > believe. > > > Shawn -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
