Hello David, Glad to hear your team is close to a full release of 2.1. Does your team have a expected release date?
Many thanks , Mike On Oct 18, 2:20 pm, "David Chandler (Google)" <drfibona...@google.com> wrote: > Hi Moejo, > > Thomas is correct about the tagging, as usual :-) > > We normally tag the release first, then build and test from the tag. > The GWT 2.1 release is being coordinated with several teams (core SDK, > GPE, and VMWare for the Spring Roo-related pieces), and when all of > them are ready, we'll announce the release on the GWT blog and related > pieces will be made available for download. > > As for the Javadocs pertaining to Activity, Places, RequestFactory, > and related classes, most of the "experimental API" warnings have now > been removed in trunk. There are no changes to these APIs expected > from 2.1 RC to the 2.1 release, so the RC is a good basis on which to > begin building your app. > > Thanks for your interest in GWT 2.1! > > David Chandler > Developer Programs Engineer, GWT > > On Oct 18, 7:53 am, moejo <mahamad.el.tan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Thomas - you're an absolute star! > > > I am very happy to hear that Google's almost there with the GWT 2.1 > > version - can't wait to get it up and running on our new project. > > > Cheers again, > > > On Oct 17, 10:20 pm, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 17 oct, 20:44, moejo <mahamad.el.tan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > This is more a question towards the GWT team. > > > > > We are currently kicking off a new project and since we're huge GWT > > > > fans, we're jumping straight into GWT 2.1 RC1 and love it. (We've > > > > been using GWT since version 1.3 so we're always excited about the > > > > upgrades!) > > > > > However, since it's still at RC1, I'd love to know the timeline for > > > > RC2 and the released version? > > > > Fun to ask this 2 hours after they tag the 2.1.0 release > > > ;-)http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/source/detail?r=9112 > > > (yeah, a sunday, I'm as surprised as you probably are) > > > > > Most importantly, I've found lots of red javadoc comments such as: > > > > > <span style="color:red">Experimental API: This class is still under > > > > rapid > > > > * development, and is very likely to be deleted. Use it at your own > > > > risk. > > > > * </span> > > > > > Are these old javadoc comments or are classes such as Place, Activity, > > > > and other plumbing classes really going to be replaced with completely > > > > different code? > > > > Old > > > Javadoc:http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5380http... > > > > > We'd like to avoid having to refactor huge portions of code in 2 > > > > months time, so was hoping you could raise a little bit of light on > > > > what the roadmap is timeline wise and what changes you are already > > > > looking at. > > > > RC1 was explicitly announced as an "API > > > freeze":http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/2010/10/gwt-21-rc1-is-now-availa... > > > """if you're looking to start a project with GWT 2.1, you can feel > > > confident that your team won't have to refactor code because we've > > > switched out interfaces between now and the final release.""" -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
