Ramon, Here's the GWT issue for the requested change: http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5482
/dmc On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:53 AM, Ramon Buckland <ra...@thebuckland.com> wrote: >> Though there are shortcomings in the RC1 release; which includes the >> findXxx static method on your entities (data model). >> I've heard this will be sorted out in a 2.1.1 release shortly after >> the 2.1.0. >> > > This design, I assume, comes from how Spring-ROO has the finder > 'design' embedded via Aspects into the Domain Model. > > Is there an issue number for this change? > > Like agi, I have a sizeable application with an existing DAO layer. > The DAO layer, is "pluggable" into the Domain Objects but it certainly > does not feel right to do this. > > I played with Spring-ROO for a good couple of weeks and found the > Aspect nature, though "neat", slows the development process down > somewhat (Eclipse). > > Might have to create a "custom" RequestFactory that does not need this > dependency I fear. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, Google Web Toolkit http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
