Thomas, in fact it would be really nice if GWT.create() would not require literals, we wanted to use a template method throughout our framework to allow to declare the classes to instantiate, maybe you can provide the issue number so we can vote for it :-)
> > But after a month I discovered that the compiler does not like it at > > all (it complains that GWT.create must be called only using class > > literals... could be nice if it could find that MY helper is called > > with only using literals... > > It's been requested several types in the past (including by people > that now work at Google on GWT) but I guess it's either low priority > or it would require too much re-work of the compiler's internals. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
