Ok. Too bad ...
Is there any way to abort the running method on my server?
Thanks
Tom
On 7 Dez., 16:54, jhulford <jhulf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All calling it does is call the abort() method of XmlHttpRequest which
> will stop the execution of your callback, it doesn't do anything on
> your server.
>
> Check theRequest.cancel() code..it's pretty straightforward.
>
> On Dec 7, 7:01 am, newnoise <tommmuel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Does really no one got any idea?
>
> > On 29 Nov., 18:29, newnoise <tommmuel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Me again,
>
> > > just tried to make the imExpensive-method less complex, but still no
> > > success.
>
> > > TheRequestis not cancelled ... What am I doing wrong?
>
> > > Thanks
> > > Tom
>
> > > On Nov 29, 6:16 pm, newnoise <tommmuel...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hi,
>
> > > > I'm working on an GWT-App displaying a map with different layers.
> > > > Some of those layers are drawn just onrequestand just for the part
> > > > of the map which is currently displayed.
>
> > > > The Problem occurs if a user moves and zooms the map pretty fast, so
> > > > that a lot of pictures have to be drawn. This results in quite a time
> > > > of waiting when he finally stops. What I tried was tocancelthe
> > > >requestusingRequest.cancel(the Async Method returnsRequestinstead
> > > > of void), but all the pictures are drawn anyway.
>
> > > > How does theRequest.cancel-method work? Is it just blocking the
> > > > Callback? Or does it actuallycancelthe running code on server-side?
> > > > Maybe the problem is, that the specific method contains mainly one
> > > > complex method-call? The specific method-scheme looks like:
>
> > > > public Boolean update() {
> > > > int a = 2;
> > > > int b = 3;
>
> > > > int x = imExpensive(a,b); // method which needs like 95% of
> > > > calculating time
>
> > > > if (x>0) return true;
> > > > return false;
>
> > > > }
>
> > > > I suppose that theRequest.cancel-method does notcancela running
> > > > method, and stops the method right after imExpensive(). Is that right?
> > > > In that case the problem could be solved by making the method
> > > > imExpensive less complex, which would be a pretty doable task ...
>
> > > > Thanks a lot!
> > > > Tom
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
