Just in case it is not clear what I am trying to ask... The original question post began by (I thought) implying that this is not a concrete example and is peppered with words and phrases like "if every gadget", "potentially", "hyptothetically speaking" "in this hyptothetical example" and "in this kind of case". What I'm asking is - from the GWT team's POV, are there potentially classes of problems for which the whole thing "cannot be compiled" (some kind of mashup of disparate, but - for simplicity sake - somehow trustable code bases) in which GWT would just have too little insight to the problem at large to actually optimize - thereby effectively making it a non-ideal choice... Or if the GWT team had such a problem at hand - would they choose GWT, and if so, how would they deal with the implications spelled out above?
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
