Yes. I agree it will be optimized out but the problem is I need to use a class thats only on the server. So the compiler says the class is not in a module.
On Dec 21, 1:43 pm, "a...@mechnicality.com" <a...@mechnicality.com> wrote: > Sorry for jumping in, but you could use: > > public void yourMethod(...) { > if (!GWT.isClient()) { > everything in your method. > } > > } > > The complier should then ignore everything inside the conditional. > > However, it seems a bit of a kludge to exclude the whole method. Another > option is sub-classing and > have a server-side version which is a sub-class of your shared class - I've > done that before and > IMHO its a bit more elegant. > > HTH > > Alan > > On 12/21/2010 10:36 AM, kevin wrote: > > > I was hoping to do it within a class. > > > For instance, say have method a() only available on the server. > > > On Dec 21, 12:41 pm, Mauro Bertapelle<mauro.bertape...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> In the<source> tag of the module XML file you can specify the > >> subpackage associated with the classes you want GWT to compile. > >> You can even exclude some particular classes using a pattern based > >> filter:http://code.google.com/intl/it-IT/webtoolkit/doc/latest/DevGuideOrgan... > > -- > Alan Chaney > CTO and Founder, Mechnicality, Inc.www.mechnicality.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-tool...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.