So Greg i still dont get what you are trying to achieve here ?
That the guyz on the gwt team are doing a poor job ?

2011/5/17 Greg Dougherty <dougherty.greg...@mayo.edu>

> Hi Jeff,
>
> > It may not be completely obvious what is going on here
>
> Congratulations, you win "understatement of the day". :-)
>
> And that's my point.  The purpose of a JavaDoc comment is to make it
> so people CAN understand what's going on.  Those "comments" say
> nothing.  They don't say "this is a locale dependent format, go <here>
> to figure out what that format will be in your locale", they don't say
> ANYTHING.
>
> > that format changes based on the locale
>
> If that format changes with the locale, why am I getting an entirely
> non-US format?
>
> > While it probably makes sense to you to put the format into US standards,
> it
> > would totally trip up people writing GWT in french or some other
> standard.
>
> If it's locale dependent, then, since I'm writing in a US locale,
> that's what I should be seeing.  If it's not locale dependent, I don't
> see why defaulting to a non-US representation is better than
> defaulting to a US one.
>
> > The short answer is, it isn't a useless javadoc comment, it is a
> > non-existent comment.
>
> Well, I don't know how anyone else codes, but from my perspective, an
> undocumented constant in a library is a useless constant, since the
> amount of time and effort spent figuring out what it is and what it
> does could better be spent just making my own constant that does what
> I want.  Which is what I've now done in this case.
>
> > As always, you're welcome to submit a patch with javadoc.
>
> Well, my understanding is that I can't do that w/o writing to the GWT
> "Coding Standards".  They require you to write hideously ugly code,
> and I only do that when someone pays me, extra.  So I don't foresee
> myself ever writing anything for GWT.
>
> Aside from that, I'd have to spend a fair amount of time trying to
> figure out what each of those constants MEAN.  Presumably the person /
> people who wrote those comments did that in the first place.  Which
> leaves me with the question of why they didn't write that information
> down, instead of writing down that some day they needed to do that?
> And the other question of why the GWT Team allowed them to submit the
> code when it was so obviously incomplete.  Yes, I know that there's a
> lot of volunteer labor that goes into GWT.  But I would expect that
> the pride and professionalism of all involved would demand that things
> be done right, or not at all.
>
> Greg
>
> On May 16, 1:12 pm, Jeff Larsen <larse...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It may not be completely obvious what is going on here, but that format
> > changes based on the locale, so it isn't exactly easy or maintainable to
> > actually specify what each format is doing for each locale.
> >
> > While it probably makes sense to you to put the format into US standards,
> it
> > would totally trip up people writing GWT in french or someother standard.
> >
> > While this does add to the complexity, it also removes problems of if
> you're
> > writing an i18n application, you can just use datetimeformat and get the
> > desired results in the formats that you want.
> >
> > Also, if you look at the code, there is a TODO there to get the formats
> > documented. So they are already aware that they need documentation.
> >
> > The short answer is, it isn't a useless javadoc comment, it is a
> > non-existent comment.
> >
> > As always, you're welcome to submit a patch with javadoc.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Google Web Toolkit" group.
> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
>
>


-- 

GWT API for  non Java based platforms
http://code.google.com/p/gwt4air/
http://www.gwt4air.appspot.com/

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to