Good point, Thomas. Agreed, the POMs should be part of the open source project, and community participation is welcome. I'll work on getting them checked in.
As for the group/artifact IDs, I expect we'll want to use groupId com.google.web.bindery with artifacts requestfactory-server and requestfactory-client. I'll double-check to make sure there are no GWT references in the jars, but I'm sure that was the intent of moving to com.google.web.bindery. Does this make sense? /dmc On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Thomas Broyer <t.bro...@gmail.com> wrote: > As you're talking about it: is it planned to publish it as a Maven artifact > along with GWT 2.4? And if so, do you know already which groupId and > artifactId it will use? > > (and talking about Maven, I suppose you have scripts to prepare the > deployments, and pom.xml files; what's the reason for them not being in the > source repository? it would make life a bit easier to us, people building > from source) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/JYFY_7Nqp-0J. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- David Chandler Developer Programs Engineer, GWT+GAE w: http://code.google.com/ b: http://googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com/ t: @googledevtools -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
