+1 2011/10/4 Stanislav Ievlev <stanislav.iev...@gmail.com>
> +1 > 04.10.2011 12:40 пользователь "Martin Ždila" <m.zd...@gmail.com> написал: > > > Hello > > > > GWT is a perfect toolkit but there are still many small but frustrating > > issues open in bug-tracker and GWT developer team seems to be ignoring > them > > for many months or even years. GWT issues seems not to be maintained very > > > well as there are many of them not closed but are already fixed in the > SVN, > > for example: > > > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4392 > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1534 > > > > > Many issues are moved from milestone to milestone for a long time. I > > personally don't need features like GPE but rather serious GWT without > any > > critical issues. IMHO there should go the focus. > > > > My starred and very annoying issues are: > > > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1054< > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1054&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars > > > > (!) > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=2931 > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5899< > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=5899&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars > > > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4367< > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4367&can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Owner%20Milestone%20Summary%20Stars > > > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=4394 > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=1888 > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6604 > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6603 > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6600 (!!) > > - http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=6530(there > > is even a patch attached) > > > > Also I am missing documentation of validation (JSR-303). Validation is > > really very important feature for GUI framework and it should be in GWT > > maybe in pre 2.0 version. > > > > Please take a time to focus to the most critical issues and tidy up their > > > state. Our CTO is actually thinking to use more lightweight solution like > > > jQuery just because of all this frustration (mostly because GWT is not > very > > OSGi friendly) :-( > > > > Thanks in advance! > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/ZF1XevCV6FEJ. > > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com > . > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
