thx again - didn't know about that.
(i can't shake the feeling that google has some good engineers)

On Thursday, 8 March 2012 15:50:01 UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2012 3:28:18 PM UTC+1, tanteanni wrote:
>>
>> thx thomas (you seem to answer all "a&p" questions of the world)
>>
>> so you mean i have to provide an implementation (rather then an 
>> extension) of "PlaceHistoryMapper"? will @WithTokenizers work on that? Or 
>> do i have to implement all stuff for all places? or to make it simple (at 
>> least for me ;-)) could you probably  give me a draft of " 
>> PlaceHistoryMapperWithFactory".
>
>
> I meant using that one: 
> http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/place/shared/PlaceHistoryMapperWithFactory.html
>
> You use it the exact same way as PlaceHistoryMapper (you can use 
> @WithTokenizers too) except you have to provide a factory via setFactory() 
> before you can use it. the generated implementation will call methods of 
> the factory instead of instantiating tokenizers, when needed. This is 
> mostly useful when you have to somehow inject dependencies into your 
> tokenizers (and note that the factory could be your Ginjector; the 
> generator only looks at zero-arg methods returning subtypes of 
> PlaceTokenizer)
>

On Thursday, 8 March 2012 15:50:01 UTC+1, Thomas Broyer wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, March 8, 2012 3:28:18 PM UTC+1, tanteanni wrote:
>>
>> thx thomas (you seem to answer all "a&p" questions of the world)
>>
>> so you mean i have to provide an implementation (rather then an 
>> extension) of "PlaceHistoryMapper"? will @WithTokenizers work on that? Or 
>> do i have to implement all stuff for all places? or to make it simple (at 
>> least for me ;-)) could you probably  give me a draft of " 
>> PlaceHistoryMapperWithFactory".
>
>
> I meant using that one: 
> http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/javadoc/latest/com/google/gwt/place/shared/PlaceHistoryMapperWithFactory.html
>
> You use it the exact same way as PlaceHistoryMapper (you can use 
> @WithTokenizers too) except you have to provide a factory via setFactory() 
> before you can use it. the generated implementation will call methods of 
> the factory instead of instantiating tokenizers, when needed. This is 
> mostly useful when you have to somehow inject dependencies into your 
> tokenizers (and note that the factory could be your Ginjector; the 
> generator only looks at zero-arg methods returning subtypes of 
> PlaceTokenizer)
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/RVHA7szPoE4J.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.

Reply via email to