Regarding GXT I noticed that comparison website is using GXT 2.2.5 yet is comparing with new GWT 2.4, if making GWT 2.4 compliant app one would probably use the new GXT 3.0 which is in beta right now (almost RC)...I wonder how that compairs to GWT 2.4. I hope not worse.
-Dave On Mar 27, 6:28 am, dodo dard <keratonj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Frank, > > I think that too, GXT make pretty component but very expensive and very big. > Btw I found an interesting website : http://gxtvsgwt.appspot.com/after > looking at your anwser. > > Le mardi 27 mars 2012 13:54:52 UTC+2, Frank a écrit : > > > > > > > > > > > GXT and SmartGWT have bad performance imo. > > Better to write your own widgets (which takes a lot of time) using vanilla > > GWT and make them perform better. > > That is what we did and our GWT projects have very high performance. > > > Op dinsdag 27 maart 2012 11:55:14 UTC+2 schreef dodo dard het volgende: > > >> Helo, > > >> I've got friends complaining about GWT/GXT (GWT Ext) performances, well I > >> notice that if we put to many component with GXT, there will be a certain > >> waiting time (3-4s) before it got completely loaded. They said that is > >> better to write the application directly with Javascript that may I'm not > >> agreed 100%. So guys, is there any solution, best practice, limitation or > >> restriction using GXT/GWT ? Or it can't be helped ? > > >> Honestly is fun using GWT/GXT, but I'm looking a performance solution too. > > >> Regards, > >> Bowie -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
