Thanks - great idea, so i inject the abstract class "com.google.gwt.core.client.Scheduler". Do i have to bind an instance or provider to it (the provider will call get())?
ok but this is an perfect answer for this<https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups#!topic/google-web-toolkit/t1baOC4IfNo> thread. The question here is, is it good to connect the model this way? or general how do you connect the model (more than an object delivered by a service) with the presenter? On Wednesday, 25 April 2012 11:14:05 UTC+2, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, April 25, 2012 11:06:48 AM UTC+2, tanteanni wrote: >> >> Thx >> The Problem about Scheduled command is that i loose test ability - one >> main reason i use MVP (want to test the P without GWTTestCase). > > > Not if you inject the Scheduler into your activity (probably a mock one > then, or the StubScheduler implementation). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/lSQOBOQGswEJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.