Eric, Thanks for replying. I have been looking for such comforting words from someone inside Google and have been unable to find them until now. Not having a roadmap truly leaves us in the dark, which is the cause of speculation on this topic. You can keep it sufficiently vague to cover your own asses, but even something like "GWT 2.6 is be released between 2013 and 2015" would be tremendously useful. That the world's organizer of information is keeping its community in the dark by withholding information is a bit ironic, and some might call this hypocritical. Thanks again for the reassurance.
-tjw On Monday, April 30, 2012 10:54:35 AM UTC-4, Eric Clayberg (Google) wrote: > > The Dart project is also not based in ATL and most definitely is not being > cut in any way, shape or form. > > It continues to do extremely well and is on track for a major release > later this year. > > On Thursday, April 26, 2012 1:34:31 PM UTC-4, dka...@gmail.com wrote: >> >> Yes I am aware of this. There have been further developments recently >> in terms of staff, and supposedly one of the other projects being cut >> is Dart. I'll admit, maybe some of the current (and former) GWT team >> members down in Atlanta aren't seeing the whole picture, but from >> where they sit it looks pretty grim. >> >> On Apr 26, 11:43 am, dominikz <dominik.zalew...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Gee man... >> > >> > are you aware of all this? >> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/google-web-toolkit/YgVlmth_6SU/disc... > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/h17LY8cdjWAJ. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
