I can confirm that there is no problem. All is working fine.
If someone wants the compiled code, just send me an email. Regards, Adolfo. 2012/8/29 Adolfo Panizo Touzon <adolfo.pan...@gmail.com> > I am really impressed about your comments. Really smart people. > > Keep doing in that way. > > I've tried both ways to solve the problem, and the first one (including > the serialVersionUID), I had some problems (maybe I made some mistakes). > > *But with the second solution, compiling gwt with IBM's JVM is working! :) > * > > I have to do more tests, but right know all looks fine. > > For people that are having these problem just tell one thing, you should > use the jdk that is included in RAD (I've tried to download manually from > the web page and for Windows the latest version is 1.4 :O ). > > Really thanks, > > Adolfo. > > > 2012/8/28 Brian Slesinsky <skybr...@google.com> > >> >> >> On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:45:42 PM UTC-7, Thomas Broyer wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tuesday, August 28, 2012 10:17:41 PM UTC+2, Daniel Kurka wrote: >>>> >>>> I still don`t really get the issue since this is only an issue while >>>> developing GWT (am I right?) >>>> >>>> As far as I know the jars we are packing (gwt-servlet,...) do not >>>> depend on a certain JVM. >>>> Can people who need an IBM JVM running for their servers not simply use >>>> the -noserver option with an Oracle JDK? >>>> >>> >>> No, it's an issue when compiling with the GWT Compiler while processing >>> the gwtar files packaged in the gwt-user.jar (see issue 7530). >>> And the Oracle JDK is apparently not an option on some OSes (see the >>> thread in gwt-steering) >>> Moreover, the fix seems to be rather simple: follow java.io.Serializable >>> contract and provide an explicit serialVersionUID (and make sure we change >>> it whenever we modify the classes) >>> >> >> I talked to Ray a bit about this. We'd like to avoid setting >> serialVersionUID manually since it's another maintenance chore and we're >> sure to forget. We aren't doing long-term persistence, so the default way >> that serialVersionUID works should ensure that we rebuild gwttar whenever >> necessary. But perhaps this needs to be rebuilt when using IBM's JDK? >> >> I also don't understand why removing the gwtar file doesn't solve the >> problem. Something else is going on. >> >> - Brian >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Google Web Toolkit" group. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/mL20gbO7f2AJ. >> >> To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > El precio es lo que pagas. El valor es lo que recibes. > Warren Buffet > -- El precio es lo que pagas. El valor es lo que recibes. Warren Buffet -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
