I have delivered a major commercial project based on the mvp4g framework. We found it very easy to develop on. The MVP pattern allowed us to write JVM unit tests for our presenters as well. We started design work before the activities & places in gwt was released though, so I am unable to compare the two. On Sep 20, 2012 7:20 AM, "Frank Hossfeld" <frank.hossf...@web.de> wrote:
> Hi, > most of my projects are made with mvp4g. > mvp4g offers everything you need to create large applications. You will > find everything, that Activities & Places offers and a lot more. And mvp4g > will help you to avoid writing unnecessary code. > > Am Donnerstag, 13. September 2012 22:46:25 UTC+2 schrieb BM: >> >> Hello, >> Just wanted to see what are pros and cons of GWT MVP4G vs GWT Activities >> & Places? >> >> If moving to GWT MVP4G will make us miss any features which Activities & >> Places offer or MVP4G is self sufficient enough to replace Activities and >> Places. >> >> I used extensively Activities and Places and that it is second nature to >> me. But there is a lot of boiler plate code needs to be written. Trying to >> evaluate GWT MVP4G. >> >> Any thoughts would welcome. >> > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google Web Toolkit" group. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/google-web-toolkit/-/Erfd47kjAjgJ. > To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
