"I was unable to find anything generic - I needed to pick an OAuth (OpenID was out of the question, unfortunately)"
Just curious here as to why? As a developer I often wondered why OpenID has such a slow takeup relative to Facebook logins. I have only ever used a OpenID implementation myself for a forum, which was essentially pre-built, I just made a GUI for it. Is it much harder to implement then other login methods? Does it have unsuitable requirements? On Dec 14, 4:23 pm, Joonas Lehtinen <joo...@vaadin.com> wrote: > Just to report back. We were able to fix the issue and vaadin.com is no > longer asking access to contacts when you signing in with your Google > account. > > - Joonas > > > > > > > > On Thursday, December 13, 2012 12:03:47 PM UTC+2, Joonas Lehtinen wrote: > > > Looks like our login form is using wrong scope from OAuth API. We'll fix > > this asap. We are definitely not using contacts (only stored information is > > persons own email-address). > > > The wishlist page is quite simple and there is no admin inferface, so > > there is no be easy way to edit the contents. I think that better than > > trying to remove duplicates (and for that matter split comments with > > multiple proposals), you might like to analyze the most important stuff > > (both by seeing votes and number of similar entries) and publish a blog > > post about the analysis. This would probably clarify the results. > > > On Wednesday, December 12, 2012 6:53:09 PM UTC+2, V.B. wrote: > > >> Hello Joonas, > >> Thanks for your work on the report and for posting the wishlist. > >> While I agree with the previous post that the majority of the 2,600 > >> wishlist items are duplicates, there are several other valid items buried > >> in the middle or near bottom of the list, which were not covered in the > >> report. At the moment, these are not getting much attention because most > >> voters stop looking after the first 50 or so items. For example, I found > >> comments from a number of members about bugs that don't get fixed (e.g. > >> some are even 2-3 years old), and patches that don't get accepted. I also > >> saw some very important comments about how GWT needs to be better > >> marketed/publicized in order to attract more developers. I suspect that > >> issues like these would get much more up-voting if they were more visible. > >> Perhaps a member of the community (me, for example) could volunteer to > >> remove duplicates, or perhaps the list could be randomized every time it's > >> viewed. Anything to make sure *all* the important issues get attention. > > >> On a separate note, I think even more members might log in and vote if > >> not for the Access-to-Contacts requirement. > > >> Thanks again. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
