For posterity:
After setting up the Annotation Processor, I realized there were many other
issues. But User object isn't one of them. It works fine. Link, on the
other hand, does not - the reason for this is that Link object doesn't have
a default constructor. So we get errors if we try to make a LinkProxy for
it. I decided to store my link just as a String, instead of Link.
Regards,
Avanish
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Avanish Raju <yar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi GWT team,
>
> I've just started migrating from GWT-RPC to RequestFactory, and noticed
> that even when using ValueProxy to wrap the datastore objects, they aren't
> supported. For e.g, I created a UserProxy and a LinkProxy:
>
> import com.google.appengine.api.users.User;
> import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ProxyFor;
> import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ValueProxy;
>
> @ProxyFor(User.class)
> public interface UserProxy extends ValueProxy {
> String getUserId();
> String getEmail();
> String getNickName();
> String getAuthDomain();
> String getFederatedIdentity();
> }
>
> package com.kuryaat.lms.common.newdto;
>
> import com.google.appengine.api.datastore.Link;
> import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ProxyFor;
> import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ValueProxy;
>
> @ProxyFor(Link.class)
> public interface LinkProxy extends ValueProxy {
> String getValue();
>
> }
>
> And I'm using them like this:
>
> import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.EntityProxy;
> import com.google.web.bindery.requestfactory.shared.ProxyFor;
> import com.kuryaat.lms.common.dto.DocRefType;
> import com.kuryaat.lms.server.jdo.DocRef;
> import com.kuryaat.lms.server.rf.DocRefLocator;
>
> @ProxyFor(value = DocRef.class, locator = DocRefLocator.class)
> public interface DocRefProxy extends EntityProxy {
>
> String getName();
> LinkProxy getLink();
> DocRefType getDocType();
> int getStackIndex();
> String getSourceService();
> }
>
>
> But I get the following error when I try to run the code:
> [ERROR] [myapp] - Line 7: User cannot be resolved to a type
>
> What is the right way to handle these?
>
> Thanks,
> Avanish
>
> --
> "Life is what you make of it"
> Y. Avanish Raju,
>
> BTech, Computer Science and Engineering & Biotechnology,
> ICFAI University, Dehradun
>
> -----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
> Version: 3.12
> GCS/S/MU d- s:- a- C+++ UL+++ P+ L+++>++++ E-->--- W++>+++ N- o? K- w+>w++
> !O !M !V
> PS++@ PE++ Y+@ PGP- t 5? X+ R tv b+++ DI+@ D+ G e>++ h* r-- y
> ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
>
--
"Life is what you make of it"
Y. Avanish Raju,
BTech, Computer Science and Engineering & Biotechnology,
ICFAI University, Dehradun
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCS/S/MU d- s:- a- C+++ UL+++ P+ L+++>++++ E-->--- W++>+++ N- o? K- w+>w++
!O !M !V
PS++@ PE++ Y+@ PGP- t 5? X+ R tv b+++ DI+@ D+ G e>++ h* r-- y
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Google Web Toolkit" group.
To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en.
