> From my experimentation with wrap() I can see very few circumstances in > which case it is actually useful. It appears to be useful where there is > only one page. The way nesting of widgets is handled would make it tricky > in anything more complicated. >
Yes, imagine a login application. Its UI is pretty easy and you could design it right in your host html page, so no RootPanel, no LayoutPanels, etc. If you want to do any useful with it you would get a handle to these DOM elements and now you can decide if you want to work with the low level element API or if you want the higher level Widget API by using any existing *.wrap() method to attach GWT widgets to these elements. These widgets created by *.wrap() do not have any parent widgets and will cleanup themselves once you leave the login page. So IMHO its indeed for simple use cases. There are probably a good reasons why you can not wrap elements that are already managed by a widget. E.g. if you remove the widget, what would happen to the wrapped widget then? -- J. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
