So it would have been totally safe to bet the farm on EJB2.1 because that is here for good? CORBA inside JSE!
On Friday, December 13, 2013 1:35:27 AM UTC, Willie Slepecki wrote: > > My team just wrapped up an evaluation comparing gwt to jsf to be used in a > new series of applications we are planning. My team chose pure gwt over > jsf and vaadin for a variety of reasons. > > Our problem is two of the primary decision makers are convinced that gwt > is going to dilute and within 7 to 10 years be irrelevant and ended as a > product. Where did they get this idea? A blog. Post obviously. On the > other hand, since jsf is part of jee, it's going to be alive and vibrant > forever. > > I'm not asking to argue the validity of their claims I already know why > they say that and it's political, not technological. What I'm asking is, > can you help me come up with an idea to impress upon the other members of > the selection committee that this idea is unfounded and gwt would be a safe > choice? I already. Have the vaadin report they generate, but that I fear > isn't going to hold much weight. > > Maybe some records from red hat saying how many developers are dedicated > to the project, estimated annual budget senscia is spending on gwt core > development, stung like that is what these guys will care about. > > Any ideas? Thanks > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
