Amir is right, you can code using MVP without using the eventbus even if it is probably counter-productive. Your presenters will be tightly coupled if you do that which will defeat the purpose.
MVP is a coding pattern to help you organize your code. This pattern is still valid and applicable to any language. About the AppController I suggest you jump to Activities and Places, the article you are referring to is 4 years old. The purpose of the AppController was to handle the history management. Since then GWT has the Activity and Places framework to do that. I suggest you loot at those videos for MVP + event bus : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PDuhR18-EdM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kilmaSRq49g If you are interested in Activities and Places : http://ronanquillevere.github.io/2013/03/03/activities-places-intro.html#.U05XcfmSzW8 http://ronanquillevere.github.io/2013/12/28/not-nesting-activities.html#.U05XmvmSzW8 Hope it will help On Sunday, April 13, 2014 1:03:54 PM UTC+2, imen boukhris wrote: > > Hi GWT community > I m trying to respect the mvp architecture to create a gwt application > without the use of the AppController class and the event bus. I'am using a > presenter package which can communicate with the passive view and the model > and it can communicate with the "outside world" through an RPC Service > is that architecture complies with the mvp model or not?? > can any one helps me please . > sorry for my poor english > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
