Thanks for the explanation @Jens. I think I understand why the extension is important. So we can't let go if that requirement. But let's go back to the original error (subject of the topic). If I understand you correctly, I could be able to mix css and gss files by using the correct extension. In case it concerns a css file, the gss mechanism will sue the css2gss converter to create the gss file before passing it to to the closure compiler. But that is what I am doing, so why isn't that allowed? - Ed
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/google-web-toolkit. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
