OK that's absolutely fine with me, actually when i think about it, it was myself that wanted to stick with Ant/Ivy... duh. I just hit a bit of a wall last night and thought, is this really worth it!
Hi Ioannis, I'm not sure much/anything is missing from the maven build. As I said, it's working a treat for me, I'm very happy with it. Thanks Lewis On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Ioannis Canellos <[email protected]> wrote: > What is missing from our maven setup? > > On Saturday, November 26, 2011, Enis Soztutar <[email protected]> wrote: > > From my understanding for the last discussion the plan was to completely > switch to maven. But no one championed to do the required work just yet. So > if you or anyone go ahead and complete the issue that would be more than > welcome. > > > > Thanks > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > On Nov 25, 2011, at 5:32 PM, "Mattmann, Chris A (388J)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hi Lewis, > >> > >> I don't think we need a formal discussion or anything about this, since > >> we have already talked about it before. I would just concentrate your > >> efforts on Maven. > >> > >> In the meanwhile, I would remove the Jenkins job that does Ant/Ivy > >> builds until one of the project members that cares about that build > >> system gets it working again. Or doesn't, in which case, by default, > >> Maven will simply be the working build system, and thus, the > >> build system. > >> > >> My favorite Apache saying: "those who do, decide." :-) > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> On Nov 25, 2011, at 2:22 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I've recently been working on two issues namely GORA-42 & GORA-61 which > are > >>> both completely Ant/Ivy related. > >>> > >>> I am a fan of Ant/Ivy, it works excellently with Nutch, but recently > I've > >>> become a huge fan of the way that Maven has been set-up within Gora. I > know > >>> we discussed this a month or so back, but having become rather > frustrated > >>> trying to upgrade/test with Ant/Ivy and getting nowhere I'm really for > >>> dropping it altogether. I just can't be bothered spending my time > trying to > >>> get something else to work, which works perfectly well with Maven. > >>> > >>> Thoughts please? > >>> > >>> Thank you > >>> > >>> -- > >>> *Lewis* > >> > >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >> Senior Computer Scientist > >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >> Office: 171-266B, Mailstop: 171-246 > >> Email: [email protected] > >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> Adjunct Assistant Professor, Computer Science Department > >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> > > > > -- > *Ioannis Canellos* > * > FuseSource <http://fusesource.com> > > ** > Blog: http://iocanel.blogspot.com > ** > Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC > Apache Camel <http://camel.apache.org/> Committer > Apache ServiceMix <http://servicemix.apache.org/> Committer > Apache Gora <http://incubator.apache.org/gora/> Committer > Apache DirectMemory <http://incubator.apache.org/directmemory/> Committer > * > -- *Lewis*
