Total archive size is ~110,000 messages. Growth is currently under
1000 per day. There may be room for improving search indexing
efficiency (incrementallity?), which could deliver tangible benefits, as
you mentioned.

I chose htDig because it appeared to beat out the competition by being
cleanly implemented, documented, robust, credible, customizable, well
supported, actively maintained, very fast at searching, linux
compatible, open source, widely used, and installable via RPM.  Its
biggest drawbacks are that indexing (as currently configured) takes
time, and that it uses a good chunk of disk space for its indexes.
(I'd rather buy more disk space than a bigger CPU, though)

As for the suggestions about re-organziation to improve
customizability, you are fundamentally right. My design focus was
service (www.mail-archive.com) oriented as opposed to product
oriented. If the focus is product oriented, re-organization to support
customization would be very helpful.

I am not currently planning a re-organization of this sort, as doing a
good job, while not compromising simplicity, will be difficult and
time consuming. My energies are still service oriented. However,
don't let that stop you, and if you make clean changes, please send
'em in!

As to your specific suggestions, I think keeping the rcfile intact (as
opposed to generated in pieces) might be important in keeping things
understandable. However, internal organization of that file and
embedded comments might be improved [i.e. organize the file into
separate sections (along the lines you mentioned?) and document
interactions]

Jeff










Reply via email to