On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:27 AM, Jorge Villalobos <[email protected]> wrote: > * Add-ons must be installed either using the add-on install system or the > install opt-in dialog > [https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2011/08/11/strengthening-user-control-of-add-ons/]. ... > Per blocklisting policy [https://wiki.mozilla.org/Blocklisting], Mozilla > will do their best to contact the developer and provide a reasonable time > frame for the problems to be corrected before a block is put in place. The > only exception to this are add-ons that are considered to be malicious or > whose developers have proven to be unreachable or unresponsive.
To me, it makes sense to give "a reasonable timeframe for the problems to be corrected before a block is put in place" before blocking extensions over accidental violations. Violations of the installation guideline typically seem obviously intentional. I don't see why we should give extension developers who violate the installation guideline in a way that looks intentional the benefit of the doubt and wait before blocklisting. -- Henri Sivonen [email protected] http://hsivonen.iki.fi/ _______________________________________________ governance mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
